Early Scottish Imperial Ventures: The Darien Scheme
Research StoryFuelled partly by the success of the London-based East India Company, Scottish imperial aspirations gathered momentum towards the end of the seventeenth century. While several Scots were engaged in the East India Company in London, or worked for it in India itself, demands for Scotland to have its own imperial venture grew in the late seventeenth century. With the passage of the 1693 Act for Encouraging Foreign Trade, Scottish merchants and businessmen were attracted by the prospect of trading under the Great Seal of Scotland. As a result, the Company of Scotland, Trading to Africa and the Indies, was established two years later on this day (26 June).
The new Company moved quickly to secure a piece of the imperial cake – not least because overseas trade promised greater independence from England. Financial constraints would have crippled Company projects before they could even begin had it not been for a remarkable subscription scheme: as T.M. Devine has noted, the Company ‘had caught the national mood’, the scheme transforming into a ‘patriotic crusade’. Under the leadership of William Paterson, a settlement at Darien on the isthmus of Panama was to become the shining jewel of that crusade. To widespread disappointment, the scheme failed. This was a result of poor planning and lack of knowledge of the place chosen for settlement, but also geopolitical complications – King William, for instance, failed to provide aid because he did not want to upset the Spanish Empire.
Apart from severe economic repercussions, the scheme’s failure dealt a blow to Scotland’s national pride: large numbers of Scots from all over the country had invested money into the venture, subscribing not simply to the Company, but also a national project intended to boost Scotland’s position in relation to that of England. The scheme’s collapse, therefore, essentially had the opposite effect, further limiting the political options Scotland could exercise. Combined with the succession crisis of 1703, the failure of the Darien scheme thus made parliamentary union with England a viable political as well as economic option. Those in favour of union viewed it as an opportunity for improved trade relations with England, obviating hostile regulations and protectionism. The integration of both countries into a new mercantile system of commerce was attractive to many Scottish politicians and businessmen interested in using the country’s natural resources in their quest to access and develop new markets. The possibilities of economic gain were a strong pro-union inducement, strengthening an indigenous class of capitalists that would eventually make its way to remote climes.
Archives
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
Calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 | 31 |
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.